I have seen many people who are completely oblivious to the looks of their desktop-a matter of personal preference that I fully respect and understand-but for some inexplicable reason, I cannot stand looking at a desktop with files scattered about here and there. At the minimum, I use the sort function to make sure that the dekstop’s aesthetics is passable by my standards. (Yes, I might have minor obsessive-compulsive disorder, although I highly doubt it given that my actual physical desktop is in a state of chaos most of the time. Typora is a wondeful text editor that suits my minimalistic taste. It’s UI is clean and simple, making the editor extremely intuitive and easy to use. Upon installation, the user is sent to a refreshingly blank slate, with only a single cursor blinking at the user as if welcoming them to write and get creative. The minimalilstic looks of the editor makes it distraction-free, allowing the user to concentrate on writing and writing only, which is precisely what a text editor is designed for. This is not to say that Typora is lacking in functionality: it comes with full support for $\LaTeX$ and code snippet support, with real-time rendering of course, my favorite part. I know that there are other popular editors and note-taking applications out there, such as Bear and Notion, which I might try out in the future. However, not all such applications are free (Typora is free on macOS as of now). Also, many of them come with a wealth of additional features that I will perhaps never use. To me, the simplicity and powerfulness of Typora seems to strike just the right balance. For now, my writing scheme will be splilt between Jupyter Notebooks for posts involving code execution, and Typora for casual and math-exclusive articles. I might also consider learning the syntax of R markdown, in which case R Studio might become a third option, but that’s only a possibility at this point, and at any rate a story for a later time.Where you can use GitLab Flavored Markdown.Differences between GitLab Flavored Markdown and standard Markdown. ![]() ![]() Features not found in standard Markdown.Show the issue, merge request, or epic title in the reference.Embedding metrics in GitLab Flavored Markdown.Features extended from standard Markdown.Multiple underscores in words and mid-word emphasis.References GitLab Flavored Markdown (GLFM). ![]() When this list is rendered, it looks like this: The GitLab documentation websiteĪnd the main GitLab website use Kramdown instead. You should not view this page in the documentation, but instead view these styles as they appear on GitLab. GitLab Flavored Markdown extends the CommonMark specification. You can use GitLab Flavored Markdown in the following areas: Where you can use GitLab Flavored Markdown It was inspired by GitHub Flavored Markdown.Snippets (the snippet must be named with a.You can also use other rich text files in GitLab. Differences between GitLab Flavored Markdown and standard Markdown For more information, see the gitlab-markup gem project. GitLab uses standard CommonMark formatting. However, GitLab Flavored MarkdownĮxtends standard Markdown with features made specifically for GitLab.Math equations and symbols written in LaTeXįeatures extended from standard Markdown: Standard Markdown Extended Markdown in GitLab blockquotes multi-line blockquotes code blocks colored code and syntax highlighting emphasis multiple underscores in words headers linkable Header IDs images embedded videos and audio line breaks more line break control links automatically linking URLs Features not found in standard Markdown. ![]() The following features are not found in standard Markdown.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |